underdeveloped or weak or subaltern cultures,
The end of the bourgeois subject has traditionally been framed in terms of the growth of the monopolies, the end of classical free enterprise, and the proliferation of what was once known as ‘organization man’.
For the question of universals, which is also the question not of particulars but of singularities, was at the heart of the old medieval controversy around nominalism: and the latter asserted that universals were little more than words and verbal abstractions, flatus vocis, which had no relevance to the world of truly individual things and items, a world of singularities
We are in other words so completely submerged in the human world, in what Heidegger called the ontic, that we have little time any longer for what he liked to call the question of Being.
inasmuch as these constitute the doxa or the widespread opinions of the current moment, I am certainly not immune to their influence and attraction
sorta defined (you have to assume)
