In a humanistic information economy, as people age, they will collect royalties on value they brought into the world when they were younger. This seems to me to be a highly moral use of information technology. It remembers the right data. The very idea that our world is construed in such a way that the lifetime contributions of hardworking, creative people can be forgotten, that they can be sent perpetually back to the starting gate, is a deep injustice.
Putting it that way makes the complaint sound leftist. But today's there's also an erasure of what should be legitimate capital. The right should be just as outraged. The proposal here is not redistributionist or socialist. Royalties based on creative contributions from a whole lifetime would always be flowing freshly. It would be wealth earned, not entitlement.
there is literally no such thing as wealth "earned", it is ALWAYS entitlement. you "earn" it by some sort of social and regulatory convention, and the amount is not the result of some universal arbitration process, either ...
we (as a society) need to address this idea of "earning" wealth. it's such a key facet of capitalist realism and so pernicious