Welcome to Bookmarker!

This is a personal project by @dellsystem. I built this to help me retain information from the books I'm reading.

Source code on GitHub (MIT license).

Charity is based on the sentiment of 'pity' and, as the philosopher David Hume noted, pity is akin to contempt. Private charity as a central feature of social policy may satisfy libertarians, but it profoundly offends the central idea of republican freedom, that of non-domination. Being dependent on the good will of offers is not consistent with full freedom On the contrary, it compromises the freedom of the giver as well as the supplicant.

[....]

The fact that so many people in modern society are going to food banks and shelters demonstrates social policy failure. Private philanthropy should be marginalize again; it is an undemocratic way of shaping society and the selective well-being of individuals, groups and communities.

thought: private charity does intersect (or at least approximate) democracy in the case where capital allocation is proportionate and remains that way (i.e., there is full capital distributional equality), but then it's indistinguishable from regular democracy and provision of social services and it's also quite different from what we think of as charity so yeah burn it down

—p.213 The Alternatives (185) by Guy Standing 7 years, 3 months ago