[...] A job guarantee would be a deception. What sort of jobs would be guaranteed? At what rate of pay would they be provided? What would be the consequence for declining the specific job being 'guaranteed'? Since it is completely unrealistic to guarantee everyone a job that suits them, makes use of their skills and pays well, in practice the job would be low-level, low-paid, short-term and 'make-work', or at best low-productivity labour. Cleaning the streets, filling shelves in supermarkets and similar menial activities are an unlikely road to happiness. Those arguing for a job guarantee would certainly not want those jobs for themselves or their children.
on the guaranteed job proposal as an alternative to BI
there was someone at Left Forum who proposed jobs related to environmental costs, like building renewal energy and stuff, need to look into that some more (but it's still not necessarily work that could be done by anyone)
the big question is: would we want GJ because there is actually work that absolutely needs to be done? or is it more to "punish" people and make them suffer before they earn the right to live?