Welcome to Bookmarker!

This is a personal project by @dellsystem. I built this to help me retain information from the books I'm reading.

Source code on GitHub (MIT license).

[...] Think of the example often cited by Thomas Friedman: the California farmworker earning $14,000 a year who acquired a mortgage for a house worth $720,000. Instead of sniffing, as Friedman does, that such people should not be living in such houses, we should ask, “Why not?” In the absence of any comprehensive housing policy, and in light of the manifest inequalities traversed by the circuits of credit, why is the farmworker’s leverage any more outrageous than the deals struck on Wall Street every day? Instead of trying to regain some prudent sense of proportion that once again excludes the wrong sort of people from borrowing, shouldn’t we aim for a future in which nobody is, as Deleuze put it, “too poor for debt”?

in that vein: why is the house so expensive? why is the farmer's salary so low? need to acknowledge that neither is a "natural" outcome

—p.175 Conclusion: Who’s Afraid of Jubilee? (171) by Richard Dienst 6 years, 7 months ago