Welcome to Bookmarker!

This is a personal project by @dellsystem. I built this to help me retain information from the books I'm reading.

Source code on GitHub (MIT license).

Activity

You added a note
7 years, 3 months ago

the communal structures of language users

[...] according to Wittgenstein, meaning is not determined by reference to the world or to the thoughts of the speaker but results from the communal structures of language users. In light of this view, the non-referentiality of literary texts does not pose a problem: fiction is not an atypical form…

—p.156 Existentialist Engagement in Wallace, Eggers and Foer: A Philosophical Analysis of Contemporary American Literature Wittgenstein and Wallace: The Meaning of Fiction (132) by Allard Pieter den Dulk
You added a note
7 years, 3 months ago

solipsism and private languages

Wallace's story illustrates the solipsistic problems caused by the (hyper)reflexive attitude. For this attitude causes us to regard our so-called internal processes--thoughts, feelings, et cetera--as objects, 'as things that we have', and ourselves as the exclusive 'owners' of those objects. Althou…

—p.148 Wittgenstein and Wallace: The Meaning of Fiction (132) by Allard Pieter den Dulk
You added a note
7 years, 3 months ago

verbal vs ostensive definitions

Wittgenstein writes that there seem to be two ways of explaining the meaning of a word: through 'verbal' and through 'ostensive' definitions. A verbal definition explains a statement with the help of another statement. An ostensive definition is, in the words of McGinn, 'an act of giving the meanin…

—p.138 Wittgenstein and Wallace: The Meaning of Fiction (132) by Allard Pieter den Dulk
You added a note
7 years, 3 months ago

the problem with American Psycho

Wallace reproaches Ellis for failing to offer any alternative, or any insight in addition to what he mocks and ridicules as the 'darkness of the time'. This critique is directly in line with Kierkegaard's view of irony, and the need for realizing a positivity in its wake.

Thus American Psycho

—p.127 Postmodernist Minimialism: Bret Easton Ellis (109) by Allard Pieter den Dulk
You added a note
7 years, 3 months ago

the problems with deconstruction and metafiction

[...] Derrida and Barth's goals are not to destroy what they regard as both illusory and indispensable notions, but to maintain their unresolvability, endlessly revoking, postponing the determination of meaning.

Here, in this endless cycle of affirmation and undermining, we can readily see that …

—p.108 Postmodernist Metafiction: John Barth (88) by Allard Pieter den Dulk