Welcome to Bookmarker!

This is a personal project by @dellsystem. I built this to help me retain information from the books I'm reading.

Source code on GitHub (MIT license).

Thing 13

Making rich people richer doesn't make the rest of us richer

0
terms
2
notes

it only works under certain conditions: if they're forced to actually invest in productive things (through policy measures) and then share the fruits of such growth through a strong welfare state (or other such mechanism)

Chang, H. (2011). Thing 13. In Chang, H. 23 Things They Don't Tell You About Capitalism. Bloomsbury Press, pp. 137-147

The nineteenth-century liberals believed that abstinence was the key to wealth accumulation and thus economic development. Having acquired the fruits of their labour, people need to abstain from instant gratification and invest it, if they were to accumulate wealth. In this world view, the poor were poor because the did not have the character to exercise such abstinence. Therefore, if you gave the poor voting rights, they would want to maximize their current consumption, rather than investment, by imposing taxes on the rich and spending them. This might make the poor better off in the short run, but it would make them worse off in the long run by reducing investment and thus growth.

by Ha-Joon Chang 6 years, 11 months ago

The nineteenth-century liberals believed that abstinence was the key to wealth accumulation and thus economic development. Having acquired the fruits of their labour, people need to abstain from instant gratification and invest it, if they were to accumulate wealth. In this world view, the poor were poor because the did not have the character to exercise such abstinence. Therefore, if you gave the poor voting rights, they would want to maximize their current consumption, rather than investment, by imposing taxes on the rich and spending them. This might make the poor better off in the short run, but it would make them worse off in the long run by reducing investment and thus growth.

by Ha-Joon Chang 6 years, 11 months ago

[...] Before the Golden Age, per capita income in the rich capitalist economies used to grow at 1-1.5 per cent per year. During the Golden Age, it grew at 2-3 per cent in the US and Britain, 4-5 per cent in Western Europe, and 8 per cent in Japan. Since then, these countries have never managed to grow faster than that.

1950-1973 in rich countries, coinciding with growth in progressive taxation and social welfare spending

by Ha-Joon Chang 6 years, 11 months ago

[...] Before the Golden Age, per capita income in the rich capitalist economies used to grow at 1-1.5 per cent per year. During the Golden Age, it grew at 2-3 per cent in the US and Britain, 4-5 per cent in Western Europe, and 8 per cent in Japan. Since then, these countries have never managed to grow faster than that.

1950-1973 in rich countries, coinciding with growth in progressive taxation and social welfare spending

by Ha-Joon Chang 6 years, 11 months ago