Welcome to Bookmarker!

This is a personal project by @dellsystem. I built this to help me retain information from the books I'm reading.

Source code on GitHub (MIT license).

85

The Struggle for Union Reform: Rank-and-File Unionism

0
terms
2
notes

Aronowitz, S. (2015). The Struggle for Union Reform: Rank-and-File Unionism. In Aronowitz, S. The Death and Life of American Labor: Toward a New Worker's Movement. Verso, pp. 85-106

94

[...] New York’s other unions, some of them among the largest and most powerful in the country, were mostly indifferent to public employees and particularly unsympathetic to teacher unionism: teachers were college-educated and their collective profile did not fit into a labor movement of more than a million industrial, construction, and transportation workers, many of whom were not even high school graduates. In general, the unions shared the prejudice that professionals—including teachers, doctors, nurses and many other categories of public employees—were not organizable.

so relevant to tech!! omg

—p.94 by Stanley Aronowitz 5 years, 5 months ago

[...] New York’s other unions, some of them among the largest and most powerful in the country, were mostly indifferent to public employees and particularly unsympathetic to teacher unionism: teachers were college-educated and their collective profile did not fit into a labor movement of more than a million industrial, construction, and transportation workers, many of whom were not even high school graduates. In general, the unions shared the prejudice that professionals—including teachers, doctors, nurses and many other categories of public employees—were not organizable.

so relevant to tech!! omg

—p.94 by Stanley Aronowitz 5 years, 5 months ago
97

In 1975–76, New York City declared a fiscal crisis when the large financial institutions refused to extend their usual short-term loans to the city government unless the political establishment and the public unions agreed to severe budget reductions. The unions and the Democratic mayor, Abraham Beame, prepared for the worst, and they were not surprised when the city’s finances were taken over by a bank-controlled Emergency Financial Control Board (EFCB). District Council 37 agreed to the layoff of 50,000 non–civil service employees, many of whom were black and Latino, and other municipal unions accepted reductions as well. Education budgets were slashed; improvements in teachers’ working conditions were put on hold and pay increases were frozen and then reduced.

The United Federation of Teachers (UFT) accepted the financial board that Wall Street had forced on the city and also accepted the EFCB’s proposal to transfer some of the municipal government’s autonomous functions to the state. The union further endorsed the board’s layoff of thousands of paraprofessional school workers, many of whom assisted classroom teachers. City government imposed unpaid furloughs on those remaining on the payrolls. Local union leaders, most of them Shanker and Feldman loyalists, all but abandoned their earlier industrial-union militancy

i vaguely remember reading something about the NYC fiscal crisis in something unrelated (DFW even, maybe??) so it's cool to read about it from the perspective of labour

—p.97 by Stanley Aronowitz 5 years, 5 months ago

In 1975–76, New York City declared a fiscal crisis when the large financial institutions refused to extend their usual short-term loans to the city government unless the political establishment and the public unions agreed to severe budget reductions. The unions and the Democratic mayor, Abraham Beame, prepared for the worst, and they were not surprised when the city’s finances were taken over by a bank-controlled Emergency Financial Control Board (EFCB). District Council 37 agreed to the layoff of 50,000 non–civil service employees, many of whom were black and Latino, and other municipal unions accepted reductions as well. Education budgets were slashed; improvements in teachers’ working conditions were put on hold and pay increases were frozen and then reduced.

The United Federation of Teachers (UFT) accepted the financial board that Wall Street had forced on the city and also accepted the EFCB’s proposal to transfer some of the municipal government’s autonomous functions to the state. The union further endorsed the board’s layoff of thousands of paraprofessional school workers, many of whom assisted classroom teachers. City government imposed unpaid furloughs on those remaining on the payrolls. Local union leaders, most of them Shanker and Feldman loyalists, all but abandoned their earlier industrial-union militancy

i vaguely remember reading something about the NYC fiscal crisis in something unrelated (DFW even, maybe??) so it's cool to read about it from the perspective of labour

—p.97 by Stanley Aronowitz 5 years, 5 months ago