[...] Albert Hirschman also basically assumes that we are facing a shift from "divisible" to "indivisible" conflicts, whose peculiarity consists in the fact that the contested good--precisely consists in the fact that the contested good--precisely this "collective identity"--cannot be parceled out from the standpoint of distributive justice. [...]
[...] Albert Hirschman also basically assumes that we are facing a shift from "divisible" to "indivisible" conflicts, whose peculiarity consists in the fact that the contested good--precisely consists in the fact that the contested good--precisely this "collective identity"--cannot be parceled out from the standpoint of distributive justice. [...]
the philosophical attempt to describe things in terms of their apparent intrinsic purpose, directive principle, or goal, irrespective of human use or opinion
recognition theory--insofar as it is now understood as a teleological conception of social justice
recognition theory--insofar as it is now understood as a teleological conception of social justice