Sontag, S. (2009). Against Interpretation and Other Essays. Penguin Classics.
basically says his notebooks aren't worth reading (unlike Kafka, Gide)
1 / 1English translation of a weird French book
0 / 0on Lévi-Strauss
1 / 1no real takeaways but it was dece and relevant to my interests
no real takeaways but it was dece and relevant to my interests
2 / 0on his plays/essays and anti-intellectualism? dont know anything about him tbh
1 / 0a play about the Eichmann trial
1 / 0analysed with a religious lens. mentions Brecht. I liked this one
1 / 1Arthur Miller's After the Fall and The Deputy again (analysed in terms of their political messages). also movies: Great Dictator, Doctor Strangelove. James Baldwin's Blues for Mister Charlie. some others, idk
Arthur Miller's After the Fall and The Deputy again (analysed in terms of their political messages). also movies: Great Dictator, Doctor Strangelove. James Baldwin's Blues for Mister Charlie. some others, idk
2 / 0Peter Weiss' play The Persecution and Assassination of Jean-Paul Marat as Performed by the Inmates of the Asylum of Charenton Under the Direction of the Marquis de Sade
Peter Weiss' play The Persecution and Assassination of Jean-Paul Marat as Performed by the Inmates of the Asylum of Charenton Under the Direction of the Marquis de Sade
1 / 0more films ugh
1 / 0on sci-fi films. some interesting points
1 / 1a weird film depicting an orgy that Sontag seems to really like?
a weird film depicting an orgy that Sontag seems to really like?
2 / 0a French, post-WWII film
0 / 0films are more interesting than novels to her cus the field is advancing so quickly?
films are more interesting than novels to her cus the field is advancing so quickly?
0 / 0the idea of being "religious" without adhering to a specific religion (which is as silly, from her POV, as speaking "language" without speaking a particular one). mostly a scathing review of Walter Kaufmann's Religion from Tolstoy to Camus, which she thinks did not choose pieces very well
the idea of being "religious" without adhering to a specific religion (which is as silly, from her POV, as speaking "language" without speaking a particular one). mostly a scathing review of Walter Kaufmann's Religion from Tolstoy to Camus, which she thinks did not choose pieces very well
0 / 0she pairs it with Herbert Marcuse's Eros and Civilization (1955) in ushering in a new generation of Freudian thought in America. she talks about eschatology and immanence which I would normally find cool but I don't really see the relevance of what she's saying
she pairs it with Herbert Marcuse's Eros and Civilization (1955) in ushering in a new generation of Freudian thought in America. she talks about eschatology and immanence which I would normally find cool but I don't really see the relevance of what she's saying
2 / 1about this weird (dated?) type of interactive performance art happening in NYC
about this weird (dated?) type of interactive performance art happening in NYC
1 / 0a numbered list, oddly enough ... I don't really disagree with anything, I guess I just don't know why this was necessary
a numbered list, oddly enough ... I don't really disagree with anything, I guess I just don't know why this was necessary
3 / 0on a recent schism between a literary culture and a scientific one? idk
on a recent schism between a literary culture and a scientific one? idk
0 / 0apparently this was a defining book for the 60s though tbh I don't really see why
apparently this was a defining book for the 60s though tbh I don't really see why
0 / 0