Welcome to Bookmarker!

This is a personal project by @dellsystem. I built this to help me retain information from the books I'm reading.

Source code on GitHub (MIT license).

143

Markets and Energy Landscapes

1
terms
1
notes

Lanier, J. (2014). Markets and Energy Landscapes. In Lanier, J. Who Owns the Future?. Simon Schuster, pp. 143-152

a theory developed by supply-side economist Arthur Laffer to show the relationship between tax rates and the amount of tax revenue collected by governments (a typically conservative theory that believes that too much taxation will depress business investment)

149

This is the Laffer curve, which was promoted by one late 20th century president, Ronald Reagan, and ridiculed by another, George H. W. Bush, as "voodoo economics."

omg i'm pretty sure the graph here is UPSIDE DOWN

—p.149 by Jaron Lanier
notable
7 years, 2 months ago

This is the Laffer curve, which was promoted by one late 20th century president, Ronald Reagan, and ridiculed by another, George H. W. Bush, as "voodoo economics."

omg i'm pretty sure the graph here is UPSIDE DOWN

—p.149 by Jaron Lanier
notable
7 years, 2 months ago
152

Keynes was an unapologetic financial elitist and had no interest in a quest for income equality or a planned economy. He simply sought a mechanism to get stuck markets unstuck. No one has proposed an alternative to his idea of a stimulus. The enduring nuisance is that someone has to guess about exactly how and when to aim a stimulus kick; this is just another way of saying you can't have science without scientists.

I ... don't know if I would agree, from having read Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren + various secondary sources on Keynes, but maybe Lanier's just trying to make him more palatable for the conservatives in his audience?

this passage is situated in a larger musing on local maximums and the complicated, risky ways we can get out of them and on to higher equilibrium points (which is relevant)

—p.152 by Jaron Lanier 7 years, 2 months ago

Keynes was an unapologetic financial elitist and had no interest in a quest for income equality or a planned economy. He simply sought a mechanism to get stuck markets unstuck. No one has proposed an alternative to his idea of a stimulus. The enduring nuisance is that someone has to guess about exactly how and when to aim a stimulus kick; this is just another way of saying you can't have science without scientists.

I ... don't know if I would agree, from having read Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren + various secondary sources on Keynes, but maybe Lanier's just trying to make him more palatable for the conservatives in his audience?

this passage is situated in a larger musing on local maximums and the complicated, risky ways we can get out of them and on to higher equilibrium points (which is relevant)

—p.152 by Jaron Lanier 7 years, 2 months ago