This is a personal project by @dellsystem. I built this to
help me retain
information from the books I'm reading.
Source code on GitHub
(MIT license).
Eagleton, T. (2007). The Meaning of Life. Oxford University Press, USA.
Oxford University Press, USA,
2007.
187 pages.
Hardcover.
9780199210701
24
14
4
- talks a lot about Wittgenstein's theories on false questions + the idea of private languages (the pain example)
- on religion and how its decline ushered in a world where meaning was suddenly uncertain
- on celebrity fads and the commercialisation of the search for meaning
- on the role that sport plays in many peoples' lives
9
/
7
- talks a lot about Wittgenstein's theories on false questions + the idea of private languages (the pain example)
- on religion and how its decline ushered in a world where meaning was suddenly uncertain
- on celebrity fads and the commercialisation of the search for meaning
- on the role that sport plays in many peoples' lives
9
/
7
- splits out various common definitions of meaning as either: 1) intending; 2) signifying; or 3) intending to signify, none of which work for "the meaning of life"
- a little more on language-games (without calling them that)
- the famous soliloquy from Macbeth (sound and fury, signifying nothing, etc)
- Schopenhauer's views on mankind being victim to a malevolent greater power
- Althusser on ideology being, perhaps, necessary
- Lacan on the dichotomy between meaning and being
5
/
3
- splits out various common definitions of meaning as either: 1) intending; 2) signifying; or 3) intending to signify, none of which work for "the meaning of life"
- a little more on language-games (without calling them that)
- the famous soliloquy from Macbeth (sound and fury, signifying nothing, etc)
- Schopenhauer's views on mankind being victim to a malevolent greater power
- Althusser on ideology being, perhaps, necessary
- Lacan on the dichotomy between meaning and being
5
/
3
- how some writers like Chekhov, Conrad, Kafka, Beckett feature a "central absence" in their work, since the societal (?) slipping away of meaning was noticeable during their lifetimes
- on the other hand, postmodernism doesn't have the same issue, since it's not old enough to recall a time when there was meaning
- a lot about Beckett straddling modernism and postmodernism (Eagleton seems to really like Beckett)
- goes into what is essentially death-of-the-author stuff without referring to it by name
- also transcedence vs facticity, though again without using those words (I guess they're old ideas)
4
/
2
- how some writers like Chekhov, Conrad, Kafka, Beckett feature a "central absence" in their work, since the societal (?) slipping away of meaning was noticeable during their lifetimes
- on the other hand, postmodernism doesn't have the same issue, since it's not old enough to recall a time when there was meaning
- a lot about Beckett straddling modernism and postmodernism (Eagleton seems to really like Beckett)
- goes into what is essentially death-of-the-author stuff without referring to it by name
- also transcedence vs facticity, though again without using those words (I guess they're old ideas)
4
/
2
on Aristotle, and inequality, and individual/common answers to the question
6
/
2
on Aristotle, and inequality, and individual/common answers to the question
6
/
2